Model selection and routing
We test candidate models on your data and route each step to the cheapest one that meets the accuracy bar, with fallbacks across providers.

Labs 24 builds LLM features and pipelines that hold up in production. We pick the model per step, shape the prompts and outputs, fine-tune when it pays, and track accuracy and cost per task from day one.
LLM engineering is the discipline of turning large language models into reliable production software: choosing models, designing prompts and context, enforcing structured outputs, fine-tuning, and controlling cost, latency and quality. Labs 24 does LLM development with forward deployed engineers who build on your real data and measure every change against an eval set.
Any team can get an LLM to give a good answer once. LLM engineering is making it give the right answer on the ten-thousandth messy input, in the format your system expects, at a cost that still makes sense at volume.
Every step gets its own model, prompt and testEight parts of LLM engineering we own end to end. Evals and retrieval get their own disciplines in the squad.
We test candidate models on your data and route each step to the cheapest one that meets the accuracy bar, with fallbacks across providers.
Versioned prompts, few-shot examples chosen from real cases, and context windows packed with only what the step needs.
JSON schemas, typed tool calls and validation with automatic retry, so downstream systems get clean data every time.
LoRA fine-tunes and distillation from frontier models onto small ones, when volume and a fixed format make it pay.
Prompt caching, batching, streaming, shorter outputs and smaller models where they hold up. Every change measured against the baseline.
Private cloud endpoints, or open-weight models served on your own hardware with vLLM or Ollama when data must stay inside.
Reading scanned forms, invoices and photos, and handling speech in and out, with checks on every extracted field.
PII redaction, prompt-injection defences, content filters and rule checks on outputs before anything reaches a customer.
An example from an invoice-processing pipeline. Switch between sending every step to one frontier model and routing each step to the model that fits it.
Example figures from one eval run. Your numbers depend on document mix, volume and model prices, which is why we measure them first.
Most problems are solved by the first two. We move down the list only when the eval numbers say we should.
The rules fit in the prompt and a general model already knows the domain.
The answer depends on your documents or data, and that knowledge changes often.
High volume, fixed format, and you need a smaller, faster or cheaper model to do it.
Almost never worth it for a business problem. We will tell you so.
| Where the model runs | Data privacy | Quality | Cost at volume | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontier API | Provider terms; no training on your data on business plans | Highest | Highest per call | Hard reasoning steps, low to medium volume |
| Private cloud endpoint | Inside your cloud account and region | High | Medium | Regulated data with frontier-level needs |
| Self-hosted open-weight | Never leaves your network | Good, higher when fine-tuned | Lowest per call, you run the hardware | High volume, strict data rules, on-prem |
We get the quality right on a strong model, then bring cost and latency down without letting accuracy slip. A demo every Friday, on your real data.
We gather real inputs and correct answers from your team and turn them into an eval set.
Prompts, structured outputs and a strong model working end to end on your real cases.
Route steps to smaller or fine-tuned models, add caching and batching, and prove accuracy holds.
Production traffic with monitoring, provider fallbacks and alerts when quality or cost drifts.
No model loyalty. We pick on your eval numbers and keep the design portable, so switching models later is a config change.
Data that cannot leave your network? Open-weight models run on your own hardware. See Production & Cloud Engineering.
Under NDA, so clients stay unnamed. Each one runs on the client's own infrastructure with full IP transfer.

Reads and checks case documents on self-hosted open-weight models, so client files never leave the firm.

Matches offers to customers and writes the offer copy, with every output checked against the bank's eligibility rules.

Catalogue enrichment and support replies for a D2C brand, routed across small and frontier models by task.
LLM engineers work beside the people who build the agents, feed the data, run the infrastructure and sign off the risk.
Agents that use these models to finish whole tasks.
03RAG pipelines and the documents models reason over.
04Eval sets, regression tests and drift monitoring.
05GPU serving, scaling and self-hosted models.
10Reference architecture and build-or-buy calls.
11PII handling, data residency and audit trails.
LLM engineering is the discipline of turning large language models into reliable production software. It covers choosing models, designing prompts and context, enforcing structured outputs, fine-tuning, and controlling cost, latency and quality with evals. Labs 24 does it with forward deployed engineers who work on the client's real data.
LLM development services cover model selection and routing, prompt and context engineering, structured outputs and tool calling, fine-tuning and distillation, cost and latency optimisation, private or self-hosted deployment, document and vision handling, and safety checks. Labs 24 delivers all of these, measured against an eval set built from the client's own cases.
Use retrieval (RAG) when the answer depends on documents or data that change often. Fine-tune when the task is high volume with a fixed format and you need a smaller, faster or cheaper model. Most projects start with prompting and RAG; Labs 24 fine-tunes only when eval results show it pays.
There is no single best model. Labs 24 tests candidate models such as Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, Qwen and Mistral on the client's own data and picks per step: frontier models for hard reasoning, small or fine-tuned models for high-volume extraction and classification.
Yes. Labs 24 deploys open-weight models such as Llama, Qwen or Mistral on the client's own hardware or private cloud using vLLM or Ollama, so data never leaves the network. Fine-tuning can close much of the quality gap with frontier models for a specific task.
By routing each step to the cheapest model that meets the accuracy bar, replacing model calls with plain code where possible, prompt caching, batching, shorter outputs, and fine-tuning small models for high-volume steps. Every change is checked against the eval set so accuracy does not drop.
With an eval set built from hundreds of the client's real inputs and correct answers, scored automatically on every change to prompts, models or code. Production outputs are traced and sampled so drift is caught early.
Labs 24 builds an eval set from real cases and measures the current baseline, gets a strong model to the accuracy target, then cuts cost and latency with routing, caching or fine-tuning, and finally moves production traffic over with monitoring and provider fallbacks. There is a demo every Friday throughout.
Labs 24 prices after an initial embed, once the current process and costs are baselined. Pricing is tied to measured outcomes such as accuracy and cost per task, and the client keeps full IP.
A 30-minute call. We'll look at what it does today and tell you where accuracy, cost and speed can move.
Book a build call